
AI-powered code review for GitHub PRs, finding bugs and security issues.

Work AI that Works | Agents, Assistant & Search
Glean is significantly more popular in terms of media coverage and engagement.
Code Review is more geared toward B2B users, while Glean targets b2b.
Glean offers an API for integration into your workflows.
Code Review: AI-powered code review for GitHub PRs, finding bugs and security issues.. Glean: Work AI that Works | Agents, Assistant & Search. Both tools take different approaches to address similar needs.
Both are paid tools. Code Review is paid and Glean is contact.
The best choice between Code Review and Glean depends on your specific needs. Compare their features, pricing, and target audience on this page to find the tool that best fits your use case.
Code Review is primarily designed for businesses and professionals, while Glean is built for individuals.
Code Review offers: Detects bugs using a team of specialized AI agents, Provides inline comments and summary reports on GitHub PRs, Identifies logic errors, security vulnerabilities, and regressions, Language agnostic and scales analysis with PR complexity. Glean offers: Enterprise AI Search, Personal AI Assistant, AI Agentic Engine, Enterprise Graph & Data Connectors.
Based on our data, Glean currently enjoys greater popularity. However, popularity isn't the only factor — compare features to find the right tool for your needs.
Neither tool currently offers a free trial.
Glean offers 20 integrations (slack, microsoft-teams, gmail, microsoft-outlook, google-calendar...) compared to 0 for Code Review.