
AI lab building systems to optimize and automate work, starting with research.

Work AI that Works | Agents, Assistant & Search
Glean is significantly more popular in terms of media coverage and engagement.
Core Automation is more geared toward B2B users, while Glean targets b2b.
Glean offers an API for integration into your workflows.
Core Automation: AI lab building systems to optimize and automate work, starting with research.. Glean: Work AI that Works | Agents, Assistant & Search. Both tools take different approaches to address similar needs.
Both are paid tools. Core Automation is contact and Glean is contact.
The best choice between Core Automation and Glean depends on your specific needs. Compare their features, pricing, and target audience on this page to find the tool that best fits your use case.
Core Automation is primarily designed for businesses and professionals, while Glean is built for individuals.
Core Automation offers: Development of new learning algorithms, Architectures that scale better than transformers, Building a lab around small teams with highly capable agents, Automating their own work to enable more ambitious and creative work. Glean offers: Enterprise AI Search, Personal AI Assistant, AI Agentic Engine, Enterprise Graph & Data Connectors.
Based on our data, Glean currently enjoys greater popularity. However, popularity isn't the only factor — compare features to find the right tool for your needs.
Neither tool currently offers a free trial.
Glean offers 20 integrations (slack, microsoft-teams, gmail, microsoft-outlook, google-calendar...) compared to 0 for Core Automation.